Richard Overy
Blind Eye to Genocide
A Calculated Restraint: What Allied Leaders Said about the Holocaust
By Richard Breitman
Harvard University Press 352pp £29.95
This is a curious book. What Allied leaders said about the Holocaust, a term used widely only after the war, could be reproduced in a dozen pages – and what they said publicly in even fewer. Richard Breitman, who was among the first historians to show twenty-five years ago what British intelligence agencies knew about the murder of Jews in the Soviet Union, explores at length the background to and circumstances in which Allied leaders addressed the genocide but this is for the most part well known. Boiled down, the facts are that Allied leaders said very little.
Breitman examines the few occasions when the leaders might have been talking about the genocide of the Jews. Churchill’s famous speech in August 1941, in which he talked about the Germans perpetrating ‘a crime without a name’, may have been an allusion to intelligence reports showing the killing of Jews and others on the Eastern Front, but then again, according to Breitman, it may not have been. In the speech he gave in Red Square as the Germans approached in November 1941, Stalin mentioned briefly the renewal of pogroms in the captured areas, but said nothing more specific about the fate of the Jews. Breitman says Stalin probably authored a Pravda editorial in early 1942 on German atrocities, including the murder of Jews, but that cannot be confirmed. The Soviet dictator said nothing more for the rest of the war on the matter. Roosevelt remained cautious about privileging the Jews in his public comments on the war for politically prudential reasons, and as a result made few observations on the subject until late in the war, and then only brief ones.
Breitman spends much more time discussing what was known about the murder of Jews, how it was communicated and its effect on lower-level officials and ministers, rather than discussing the response of the Allied big three, which again reveals a generally ambivalent, even sceptical response to the claims of
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
Of the siblings Gwen and Augustus John, it is Augustus who has commanded most attention from collectors and connoisseurs.
Was he really the finer artist, asks Tanya Harrod, or is it time Gwen emerged from her brother’s shadow?
Tanya Harrod - Cut from the Same Canvas
Tanya Harrod: Cut from the Same Canvas - Artists, Siblings, Visionaries: The Lives and Loves of Gwen and Augustus John by Judith Mackrell
literaryreview.co.uk
As Apple has grown, one country above all has proved able to supply the skills and capacity it needs: China.
What compromises has Apple made in its pivot east? @carljackmiller investigates.
Carl Miller - Return of the Mac
Carl Miller: Return of the Mac - Apple in China: The Capture of the World’s Greatest Company by Patrick McGee
literaryreview.co.uk
We are saddened to hear of the death of Edmund White.
We've lifted the paywall on Richard Davenport-Hines's 2014 review of White's Paris memoir.
Richard Davenport-Hines - Scenes from a Literary Life
Richard Davenport-Hines: Scenes from a Literary Life - Inside a Pearl: My Years in Paris by Edmund White
literaryreview.co.uk