Joanna Kavenna
The Machine Who Knew Too Much
These Strange New Minds: How AI Learned to Talk and What It Means
By Christopher Summerfield
Viking 384pp £22
Are we heading for an AI apocalypse or are Terminator-style prophecies overblown? In 2023, the Future of Life Institute called for ‘all AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4’. Among the 33,000 signatories to this statement were AI experts Max Tegmark, Stuart Russell and Elon Musk. Meanwhile, Sam Altman, CEO of Open AI (the company behind ChatGPT), mentions in interviews that he shares a birthday with Robert Oppenheimer. Why are so many tech experts warning us about AI while simultaneously investing in it? Are we living in an actual dystopia or an age of dystopian fantasies? All sorts of people provide all sorts of answers to these questions, but the trouble is that so many of them sound (a) quite weird, (b) quite evil or (c) both.
For these reasons, I was delighted to read Christopher Summerfield’s thoughtful and illuminating book. Summerfield is a professor of cognitive neuroscience at the University of Oxford, and is neither a wild-eyed utopian nor a doleful Cassandra. His book is mostly concerned with large language models (LLMs) such as Open AI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude and Google’s Gemini. These LLMs are ‘trained’ using masses of text – taken from websites, articles, books – until they can generate copious answers to questions. Effectively, they are prediction machines, attempting to guess the next ‘token’ in a sequence of words, numbers or symbols. They used to be amusingly cranky and prone to spouting gibberish but this is rapidly changing. Summerfield argues that the dawning of an era in which ‘AI can speak’ is a ‘watershed moment’ comparable to the invention of writing, the printing press and the internet. He poses three questions: ‘How did we get here?’, ‘Do language models think?’ and ‘Are we all doomed?’
In pursuit of answers to the first two questions, Summerfield presents a lucid survey of themes including Cartesian dualism, logical positivism, the possible origins of language and why even the brainiest chimps haven’t yet written Hamlet. The explosive growth of the internet in the 1990s changed the landscape for AI,
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
It wasn’t until 1825 that Pepys’s diary became available for the first time. How it was eventually decrypted and published is a story of subterfuge and duplicity.
Kate Loveman tells the tale.
Kate Loveman - Publishing Pepys
Kate Loveman: Publishing Pepys
literaryreview.co.uk
Arthur Christopher Benson was a pillar of the Edwardian establishment. He was supremely well connected. As his newly published diaries reveal, he was also riotously indiscreet.
Piers Brendon compares Benson’s journals to others from the 20th century.
Piers Brendon - Land of Dopes & Tories
Piers Brendon: Land of Dopes & Tories - The Benson Diaries: Selections from the Diary of Arthur Christopher Benson by Eamon Duffy & Ronald Hyam (edd)
literaryreview.co.uk
Of the siblings Gwen and Augustus John, it is Augustus who has commanded most attention from collectors and connoisseurs.
Was he really the finer artist, asks Tanya Harrod, or is it time Gwen emerged from her brother’s shadow?
Tanya Harrod - Cut from the Same Canvas
Tanya Harrod: Cut from the Same Canvas - Artists, Siblings, Visionaries: The Lives and Loves of Gwen and Augustus John by Judith Mackrell
literaryreview.co.uk