In his long and distinguished career, William Doyle has established himself as both the pre-eminent British scholar working on the politics of late-18th-century France and a combative campaigner for close, empirically based analysis of high politics. This kind of approach was not uncommon among historians writing on Britain in the 18th century, even before Lewis Namier gave it his particular spin from the 1930s onwards. But in France, it has been both rare and largely depreciated in regard to the causes of the French Revolution of 1789, which is Doyle’s area of expertise. Louis XV reigned from 1715 to 1774, yet the first 20th-century scholarly biography worthy of the name, Michel Antoine’s brilliant study, was published as late as 1989. Many prominent Ancien Régime ministers have never received even one biography. Moreover, not only have historians of 18th-century France neglected high politics, but it has also been widely viewed as intellectually impoverished and politically reactionary. This made Doyle’s early writings all the more daring and indeed courageous.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
What's the worth of being zen when the icecaps are melting and populism looms? The world's leading thinkers including @ronpurser will assess the 'mindfulness' craze at the world's largest philosophy and music festival, @HTLGIFestival, this May. Learn more: http://ow.ly/STu650ywARQ
'Feminists have been caricatured so often that it’s worth recalling the many obstacles placed in the path of women campaigning for equal rights.'
@polblonde on @helenlewis's new book about difficult women throughout history.
'Too many historians sneer at our forbears; scolding them if they follow the customs of their own day ... tut-tutting if the poor things are detected having a little fun.'
From the archive, Mary Clive on medieval travellers.