In his long and distinguished career, William Doyle has established himself as both the pre-eminent British scholar working on the politics of late-18th-century France and a combative campaigner for close, empirically based analysis of high politics. This kind of approach was not uncommon among historians writing on Britain in the 18th century, even before Lewis Namier gave it his particular spin from the 1930s onwards. But in France, it has been both rare and largely depreciated in regard to the causes of the French Revolution of 1789, which is Doyle’s area of expertise. Louis XV reigned from 1715 to 1774, yet the first 20th-century scholarly biography worthy of the name, Michel Antoine’s brilliant study, was published as late as 1989. Many prominent Ancien Régime ministers have never received even one biography. Moreover, not only have historians of 18th-century France neglected high politics, but it has also been widely viewed as intellectually impoverished and politically reactionary. This made Doyle’s early writings all the more daring and indeed courageous.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Sign up to our e-newsletter and get highlights from the new issue and gems from the archive, as well as exclusive competitions and subscription offers straight to your inbox.
'These are first thoughts, but they’re made to last, in a way that makes you wonder how well something that feels so raw really can last.'
@sarahditum weighs up the final book in Ali Smith's seasonal quartet.
Enjoying Susan Owens’s essay on English attitudes to nature in @Lit_Review. Turns out the early moderns were positively repulsed by hills, as described in this poem by Isaak Walton’s fishing chum Charles Cotton.