FRIENDSHIP, FOR ALL its delights, is often seen as a poor relation of passionate love. It has long had what one might call its ‘romantic’ and ‘ethical’ critics. The romantic critic (like Proust) finds it a thin-blooded alternative to more robust forms of love and desire, or a condition into which those passions degenerate when exhausted, or a distraction from really creative devotions. The ethical critic, such as Kierkegaard, berates friendship for friends to be unconditional and universal – the two touchstones (supposedly) of the highest love, commonly denoted in the Christian tradition toby the Greek word agape. For, according to this account, friendship, unlike agape, is both selective – we can’t even aspire to be friends with everyone – and deeply conditioned by the qualities of the other person. This is why we can imagine loving a murderer as a human being, but not counting from among our close friends.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
My essay on Microstates, Money Secrets & Morality Tales is out in newsagents now, and begins with @quadererer's new Liechtenstein novel @IMLR_News @newgermanbooks https://literaryreview.co.uk/microstates-money-secrets-morality-tales via @Lit_Review
I'm against RTing praise, except when it's about me. "Wonderfully original in its approach ... one of the most stimulating books on birds I’ve read in some while". Nigel Andrew in the @Lit_Review, on AN INDIFFERENCE OF BIRDS. https://literaryreview.co.uk/thirteen-ways-of-looking-at-a-gyrfalcon
'It might seem like a form of responsible cautiousness, but really it’s a bet against the rest of us; preppers don’t just want to come out the other side, they want to come out ahead.'
@WillWiles on @Goblinmerchant's 'Bunker'.