Michael O’Brien

Class Action

In Reckless Hands: Skinner v Oklahoma and the Near-Triumph of American Eugenics

By

W W Norton 240pp £15.99 order from our bookshop

Skinner v Oklahoma (1942) is an important US Supreme Court decision, because, in annulling an Oklahoma sterilisation law, it supposedly inaugurated the modern era of civil rights. As William O Douglas, perhaps the most activist of the court’s liberal judges, observed in Skinner’s opening sentence: ‘This case touches a sensitive and important area of human rights. Oklahoma deprives certain individuals of a right which is basic to the perpetuation of a race – the right to have offspring.’ From this resonant reasoning are thought to flow many later decisions – famously, in Roe v Wade (1973), the ‘right to privacy’ – that have appalled conservatives, who can locate no such rights in the text of the constitution. Victoria Nourse plausibly suggests that this interpretation of Skinner is erroneous and that the decision, despite being made by a court staffed by New Dealers, reflected an older, not an innovative jurisprudence.

Follow Literary Review on Twitter

  • Last Tweets

    • Lecture on war and peace in 19th-century Europe by Professor Sir Richard Evans, Thurs 25 Oct, 6.30pm Europe House… ,
    • 'Why, throughout the world, are so many people fascinated by the fiction and reality of espionage? And why of all p… ,
    • . here on books, Muriel Spark and life's tangled dance ,
    • RT : There aren't enough aggressive subtitles these days: ,
    • Churchill's on the cover of the October edition of the magazine. Piers Brendon reviews two new books about the Brit… ,
    • 'Readers have no more power to predict where the next story is going to take them than the prisoners had to determi… ,
    • 'Ho was no Soviet or Chinese puppet. He was a nationalist first and foremost. Had the Americans just realised this.… ,