This book is essentially a warning to the West – a term that is never defined but refers more or less to US policy-makers – about its blinkered cyber-utopianism. Evgeny Morozov rightly disparages those who naively imagine that Internet tools alone can produce political change (a position most crudely articulated within the Washington beltway by Hillary Clinton and Jared Cohen), and warns that this is ‘how not to liberate the world’. He legitimately argues that authoritarian regimes are also active on the Internet, using surveillance, propaganda and controls on both access and content. He notes various practices employed by governments – mainly the Chinese, the Russians and the Iranians – to limit free speech and popular use of the Web, especially if deemed to be in any way political. But his argument becomes a one-sided rant about the lurking dangers to Internet free speech, and it doesn’t concede any possible use of the Net for political reform.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
An author bought a diary on eBay. By a stroke of luck, it formerly belonged to Dora Maar, Picasso's Weeping Woman. Her address book was still tucked inside. What a starting point for a biography, but oh! did I despair of the exclamation marks! https://literaryreview.co.uk/the-art-of-deduction @Lit_Review
Whitman 'licensed poets to place themselves centre stage in their prose, from Adrienne Rich in "What is Found There" to Susan Howe in her prose-poetry hybrids.'
In his memoir, Mark Doty replicates Walt Whitman's 'aesthetic of intimacy', says @nemoloris.
My review of James Hankins' "Virtue Politics: Soulcraft and Statecraft in Renaissance Italy" in this month's @Lit_Review https://literaryreview.co.uk/good-rule-hunting