Short and fragmented, these are the notebooks of two journeys made by Camus to the United States and Canada in 1946, and to South America in 1949. Forty years later, those dates seem more or less consecutive – but in the context of Camus’s career and increasingly desperate disillusion, the three years seem more like ten. You come to the book gleefully, armed with the hindsight of knowing the author to be enshrined in literary history expecting him to rip into the spiritual cote of the new world with much of traditional prejudice of the old; and you are stopped cold by a writer much younger than history remembers him, locked in struggle for his own soul.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Great essay by Seán Williams @WiggishHistory in @Lit_Review
A small country "may not have aircraft carriers or regiments of tanks. But guided by an unerring moral compass, it can triumph over even the most fearsomely armed opponent." https://twitter.com/WiggishHistory/status/1278425792385613835
'Like many works that touch on Churchill, this book takes on some of his characteristics: a jaunty prose style, a capacity for confident generalisation and a whiff of bullshit.'
Richard Vinen is unpersuaded by 'The Churchill Myths'.
'It’s history from a bird’s-eye view. From that perspective, we humans are a passing phenomenon.'
Nigel Andrew on three contrasting books about birds by @RSmythFreelance, @JenGAckerman & @JonathanSlaght.