Andrew Small
Great Game, Reluctant Players
Sinostan: China’s Inadvertent Empire
By Raffaello Pantucci & Alexandros Petersen
Oxford University Press 336pp £20
The withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan in 2021 represented more than an end to the long war in the country. It also marked a decisive pivot on the part of the USA away from continental Asia and towards the Indo-Pacific. States in the surrounding region that had grown used to the presence of US troops over twenty years were confronted with a sudden vacuum. Not only had the US military gone but with it too American money, attention and political energy. A few months later, the Russian invasion of Ukraine started to pose questions about the staying power of the region’s other dominant outside influence. The capacity of Russia, militarily drained and economically fragile, to shape outcomes across Central Asia looks considerably lessened. Across Eurasia, the big question is what this will mean for the role of the newest superpower on the block, the People’s Republic of China.
Raffaello Pantucci and Alexandros Petersen’s Sinostan thus appears at an opportune moment. It was originally a joint effort and benefits from their work and travels in Central Asia over the course of a decade, but the project was ultimately completed by Pantucci alone following the tragic murder of Petersen in Kabul in 2014. It offers a picture of both high politics and ground realities – of crisscrossing trade routes and contested cultural identities. If there is one thing you take away from the book, it is a feeling of what China’s growing influence actually amounts to in the dusty corners and scrappy trading outposts of Central Asia, where Beijing, Washington and Moscow seem impossibly far away.
The book’s subtitle, ‘China’s Inadvertent Empire’, looks all the more apposite given the events that have transpired since the manuscript was finished. The authors recognise that while this part of the world ‘has traditionally been considered a second rank concern for American and Western policymakers, who saw it
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
It wasn’t until 1825 that Pepys’s diary became available for the first time. How it was eventually decrypted and published is a story of subterfuge and duplicity.
Kate Loveman tells the tale.
Kate Loveman - Publishing Pepys
Kate Loveman: Publishing Pepys
literaryreview.co.uk
Arthur Christopher Benson was a pillar of the Edwardian establishment. He was supremely well connected. As his newly published diaries reveal, he was also riotously indiscreet.
Piers Brendon compares Benson’s journals to others from the 20th century.
Piers Brendon - Land of Dopes & Tories
Piers Brendon: Land of Dopes & Tories - The Benson Diaries: Selections from the Diary of Arthur Christopher Benson by Eamon Duffy & Ronald Hyam (edd)
literaryreview.co.uk
Of the siblings Gwen and Augustus John, it is Augustus who has commanded most attention from collectors and connoisseurs.
Was he really the finer artist, asks Tanya Harrod, or is it time Gwen emerged from her brother’s shadow?
Tanya Harrod - Cut from the Same Canvas
Tanya Harrod: Cut from the Same Canvas - Artists, Siblings, Visionaries: The Lives and Loves of Gwen and Augustus John by Judith Mackrell
literaryreview.co.uk