SCOTT TURROW WAS a member of the Illinois commission on the death penalty, set up by Governor George Ryan, which, although it did- not reach a unanimous decision, recommended the punishment’s abolition in April 2002. This book is a somewhat agonising account of the moral and practical dilemmas that have faced him in capital cases spanning his thirty-year legal career. At the end of it, in the very last sentence, he reveals that he voted ‘no’ when the members of the commission were asked whether Illinois should retain capital punishment; but it was clearly not a simple decision. On just the previous page he writes, ‘I admit I am still attracted to a death penalty that would be available for the crimes of unimaginable dimensions like [John Wayne] Gacy’s [the rape and murder of over thirty young men], or that would fully eliminate the moral risks that incorrigible monsters like [Henry] Brisbon [a habitual murderer] might ever satisfy their vampire appetites.’ The real reason why Turow doesn’t support the death penalty is not because he believes it is wrong for one human being to take the life of another, but because he can’t find a practical way to ensure that only the Gacys of this world get executed and no innocent gets carted off to the chopping block.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
'This rude spectral activity was a far cry from the moaning and chain-clanking traditionally associated with hauntings. It had a distinctly modern flavour.'
@LucyLethbridge on a real life haunting.
'I inadvertently saw "Saturn Devouring His Son" in my early teens and it was a very unsettling thing to come across.'
@robinsimonbaj on Goya.
'The narrative moves fluently between the raffish ... life he was living there, his main love affair and friendships – most of them kept up for a lifetime – and his journalism.'
Jeremy Treglown weighs up Hermione Lee's biography of Tom Stoppard.