SCOTT TURROW WAS a member of the Illinois commission on the death penalty, set up by Governor George Ryan, which, although it did- not reach a unanimous decision, recommended the punishment’s abolition in April 2002. This book is a somewhat agonising account of the moral and practical dilemmas that have faced him in capital cases spanning his thirty-year legal career. At the end of it, in the very last sentence, he reveals that he voted ‘no’ when the members of the commission were asked whether Illinois should retain capital punishment; but it was clearly not a simple decision. On just the previous page he writes, ‘I admit I am still attracted to a death penalty that would be available for the crimes of unimaginable dimensions like [John Wayne] Gacy’s [the rape and murder of over thirty young men], or that would fully eliminate the moral risks that incorrigible monsters like [Henry] Brisbon [a habitual murderer] might ever satisfy their vampire appetites.’ The real reason why Turow doesn’t support the death penalty is not because he believes it is wrong for one human being to take the life of another, but because he can’t find a practical way to ensure that only the Gacys of this world get executed and no innocent gets carted off to the chopping block.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
'Sabotage became so prevalent that bankers even created their own terms – ‘asymmetric information’, ‘lack of financial literacy’, ‘the principal-agent dilemma’ – to describe how they might turn a dime from customers’ gullibility or ignorance.'
'Unlike much that was extracted from India, these paintings were not plunder, and those who created them were properly remunerated and often received due credit.'
@PParkerWriting on 'Forgotten Masters: Indian Painting for the East India Company'.
‘"I feel", Lowell told Hardwick ... "as if I were pulled apart and thinning into mist, or rather being torn apart and still preferring that state to making a decision."'
Richard Davenport-Hines on the letters of Robert Lowell and Elizabeth Hardwick.