The essays collected in Against Interpretation date from 1961-65, and created enough of a stir to be republished in book form in 1966. In the preface to that edition, Sontag points out that they belong to a ‘period of search, reflection, and discovery’ between the writing of her first and second novels, and she returns throughout to a set of preoccupations that lends coherence to the impressive variety of her subjects (though not without some repetition, which the generic groupings of the essays – on film, on theatre etc – rather exaggerate). But, as she says, their value, if they are ‘more than just case studies of my evolving sensibilities’, must lie in ‘the interestingness of the problems raised’, especially since she ‘wanted to expose and clarify the theoretical assumptions underlying specific judgements and tastes’.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
'Everyone talks about the light on Hydra, but sometimes there’s a very good reason why everyone talks about something. The light on Hydra is bronze and blinding.'
Joanna Kavenna on Athens, the Inklings, and why Homer thought sheep were purple.
'Narratively speaking, "Antkind" doesn’t develop. It just continues. It’s a "New Yorker" Shouts & Murmurs squib inflated to Tolstoyan girth.'
@KevPow3 struggles through Charlie Kaufman's mammoth novel, 'Antkind'.