Stefan Collini’s latest book consists of a series of essays, most of which have appeared elsewhere in slightly different forms, passing a critical eye over the present condition of British universities. He attributes their worrying state to two main factors. The first is the insistence of successive governments since the late 1980s that university research in both the sciences and the humanities should bring a tangible and immediate economic benefit. This, he argues, is to misconceive the purpose of university research, which is to deepen our understanding. If, in the long term, it has economic or other material spin-offs, this is an unexpected and irrelevant consequence. The second factor is the coalition government’s decision in 2010 that the cost of undergraduate teaching should be funded completely out of student fees. As outlined in the 2015 Green Paper on higher education, the level fees are to be set at is decided by linking the fee a university can charge to the perceived quality of its teaching, and by allowing new ‘for-profit’ universities to be set up alongside existing ones. For Collini, this is the beginning of the end of the British university as we know it. On the one hand, to ensure the existing level of fee income is maintained, universities may be forced to ditch old and respectable courses in response to student whims or an external audit. On the other, some universities may actually be forced to close if their student numbers drop catastrophically in the face of cut-price competition from the new commercial sector.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
'We may not be able to shield ourselves from irrational passions such as hatred, anger, envy, mockery and pride, or from the buffetings of circumstance, but we can rise above them by obtaining insight into their nature and their causes.'
Sign up to our e-newsletter!
Get highlights from the new issue and selected archive articles, as well as exclusive competitions and subscription offers delivered straight to your inbox.
'Some Labour MPs who were shocked by Corbyn’s rise behaved appallingly ... Not only were they disloyal; they also had no coherent strategy for removing Corbyn or an alternative left-of-centre project.'