The self-portrait has been a favourite theme for art historians and the public for many years – even longer, according to the author of this stimulating book, than has generally been supposed. James Hall’s bibliography cites four books on the subject published in English alone since 2000, along with a considerable supporting literature. Not only have certain artists – most notably Rembrandt and Van Gogh – repeatedly studied their own appearance or used their own image as inspiration for artistic exploration, but the genre has attracted such major collecting enterprises as the gallery of self-portraits in the Vasari Corridor linking the Uffizi to the Palazzo Pitti in Florence: begun in 1664, it now holds over 1,600 images from the 14th century to the present. The self-portrait, after all, gives the viewer the impression that one is encountering the artist in person and gaining an understanding not only of their personality but often also of their working methods. In a society that has long been intrigued by artists’ characters and working methods, the self-portrait appears to offer an unparalleled insight into their private being. As Hall discusses with reference to Dürer, some portraits have a secret character, offering a coded image that appears to point to the sitter’s innermost being. Only in the past two centuries has the self-portrait been rivalled by that alternative form of depiction of the self, the artist’s studio or house (also discussed in this book), preserved by the individual or by their family or admirers as a personal shrine and a testament to, variously, their wealth, their grandeur, their modesty, their erudition or their aesthetic sensibility.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
'Reading Taylor’s book has also made me join a book club. I did not like the January book; I did enjoy drinking gin while saying why.'
@clamorousvoice explores the history of women readers.
'When the language starts functioning as a character in fiction, when it is there drawing attention to itself ... It’s not anything that anybody really takes seriously.'
Our interview with Anthony Burgess from 1983.
'Sabotage became so prevalent that bankers even created their own terms – ‘asymmetric information’, ‘lack of financial literacy’, ‘the principal-agent dilemma’ – to describe how they might turn a dime from customers’ gullibility or ignorance.'