Tim Whitmarsh
In Defence of Reason
The History of Philosophy
By A C Grayling
Viking 681pp £26
A C Grayling has carved out a niche not only as a lucid and accessible interpreter of philosophy for the general reader but also as a passionate advocate for the role that it can and should play in our lives. Above all, he has argued (in The Good Book, The God Argument and The Age of Genius) that philosophy offers an antidote to religion, which he sees as befuddling the wits and rendering us vulnerable to manipulation by the malign. Fans see him as a defender of rationality in an age of intellectual confusion; critics accuse him of an obsessive animus against religion and of buying too readily into an outmoded mythology of the Enlightenment. I doubt anyone has ever charged him, however, with fence-sitting, dullness or excessive diffidence. The History of Philosophy, with its echo of Hegel’s Lectures on the History of Philosophy, joins a roster of similarly boldly titled books on similarly bold themes.
Despite the title’s imperious definite article, Grayling is well aware that the world’s philosophies could never be shaped into a single, definitive historical narrative: ‘Philosophy’s history … is a retrospective construct. It is chosen from the wider stream of the history of ideas in order to provide today’s
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
My review of Jack Watling's powerful tour d'horizon of geopolitics today in @Lit_Review. Jack feels strongly but writes with cool restraint:
Patrick Porter - Putting the Grand Back in Strategy
Patrick Porter: Putting the Grand Back in Strategy - Statecraft: The New Rules of Power in a Divided World by Jack Watling
literaryreview.co.uk
Wonderful review of my new book The Nord Stream Conspiracy: " An outstanding account, something of the feel of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
crossed with The Dirty Dozen. A remarkable book." (link in subtweet)
"This thoroughgoing reassessment of the man as less of a bounder and a charlatan than something of a doomed visionary, wise before his time, shows an impressive command of its sources and matches the imperial style at its dashing best." Jonathan Keates on The People's Emperor in