Botany: A Study of Pure Curiosity by Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Kate Ottevanger (trans.) - review by Lesley Chamberlain

Lesley Chamberlain

Is What I See A Flower?

Botany: A Study of Pure Curiosity

By

Michael Joseph 156pp £10
 

Here is a slim, beautifully-produced volume aimed, I think, at the well-educated browser. Its essence lies in the charm of disinterest. Rousseau’s definition of botany as a study of pure curiosity has been incorporated into the present title from the seventh of eight letters originally published at Lettres Elémentaires sur la Botanique. In his introduction Roy McMullen doubts that Rousseau wanted to discount the scientific value of a subject that at times claimed all his intellectual resources. But he rightly alerts the reader to the tone of ‘gentlemanly amateurism’ that colours this minor work of the last years. That is its modern appeal.

The letters are not fictions. Rousseau addressed them to a young woman of his acquaintance for the eventual instruction of her daughter. On her behalf he had high hopes of a science that ‘abates the taste for frivolous amusements, subdues the tumults of passion and bestows upon the mind a

Sign Up to our newsletter

Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.

Follow Literary Review on Twitter