Required Writing: Miscellaneous Pieces 1955-1982 by Philip Larkin - review by Carol Rumens

Carol Rumens

Larkin About

Required Writing: Miscellaneous Pieces 1955-1982

By

Faber 304pp £4.95 paper order from our bookshop
Faber 304pp £4.95 order from our bookshop
 

Philip Larkin is a poet I love and admire, a novelist I like and admire, and an essayist and critic I respect and sometimes suspect. His reviews, lectures, interviews, etc. have been collected under the title Required Writing, which to me suggests a very mild, very gentlemanly disclaimer: ‘These are, after all, pieces I was commissioned to write, paid to write; if I’d been entirely following my own persuasion they might not have existed, or not in quite this form’. Very good; poets have a right to be as devious as they like in the interests of their professional integrity. But Larkin is so fine a poet that one would have liked more of himself in this book; I mean more of Larkin-the-poet, the writer who writes – even prose – because he must, not because he’s required to do so. Since any hint of pretentiousness or self-indulgence is clearly anathema to his moral sense, his editors could have shown far greater imagination in encouraging him out of his shell and engineering a few meetings between the irony-clad traditionalist and the risk-taking, emotionally-centred poet.

‘One of the great achievements of the twentieth century has been the evolution of a particular kind of prose; impatient, ardent, elliptical prose, usually in the first person, often using discontinuous or broken forms, that is mainly written by poets, or, if not, by writers with the standard of poetry

Sign Up to our newsletter

Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.

Follow Literary Review on Twitter