Nigel Andrew
Never Lost for Words
The Dictionary People: The Unsung Heroes Who Created the Oxford English Dictionary
By Sarah Ogilvie
Chatto & Windus 355pp £22
Browsing in the basement archives of Oxford University Press one day in 2015, lexicographer Sarah Ogilvie struck gold – well, lexicographer’s gold. Outwardly, it was only a battered black book tied with a cream ribbon, but it contained the names and addresses of some three thousand volunteers who had contributed to the making of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED). Each address was written out and annotated in the immaculate cursive hand of the presiding spirit and driving force of the great dictionary, James Murray, its editor from 1879 until his death in 1915.
The OED was, like many Victorian information-gathering ventures, assembled through a form of what we would now call crowdsourcing. In an age of leisured amateurs, learned societies and energetic enthusiasts, not to mention a swift and efficient postal service, this was the natural way to do things, and Murray perfected it. From the outset, the dictionary editors had invited members of the public to contribute by reading books, noting examples of how particular words were used, writing down the words and the sentences in which they occurred on four-by-six-inch slips of paper, and sending them to the editors. Until Murray took over, this had been a rather haphazard affair, but he, with characteristic thoroughness, tightened up the process and issued a worldwide appeal for more readers to join in building what was to be a dictionary of not only British English but also world English. The massive response turned Murray’s Oxford home into a lexicographical factory, with Murray and his assistants working in the Scriptorium, a large iron shed in the garden, and members of his family also enlisted in the great enterprise.
This aspect of the making of the dictionary has been written about before, notably in James’s granddaughter K M Elisabeth Murray’s Caught in the Web of Words (1977), but the contribution of all those volunteer readers has attracted far less attention, largely because so little has been known about them
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
It wasn’t until 1825 that Pepys’s diary became available for the first time. How it was eventually decrypted and published is a story of subterfuge and duplicity.
Kate Loveman tells the tale.
Kate Loveman - Publishing Pepys
Kate Loveman: Publishing Pepys
literaryreview.co.uk
Arthur Christopher Benson was a pillar of the Edwardian establishment. He was supremely well connected. As his newly published diaries reveal, he was also riotously indiscreet.
Piers Brendon compares Benson’s journals to others from the 20th century.
Piers Brendon - Land of Dopes & Tories
Piers Brendon: Land of Dopes & Tories - The Benson Diaries: Selections from the Diary of Arthur Christopher Benson by Eamon Duffy & Ronald Hyam (edd)
literaryreview.co.uk
Of the siblings Gwen and Augustus John, it is Augustus who has commanded most attention from collectors and connoisseurs.
Was he really the finer artist, asks Tanya Harrod, or is it time Gwen emerged from her brother’s shadow?
Tanya Harrod - Cut from the Same Canvas
Tanya Harrod: Cut from the Same Canvas - Artists, Siblings, Visionaries: The Lives and Loves of Gwen and Augustus John by Judith Mackrell
literaryreview.co.uk