Robert Tombs

Occupation Hazards

Fighters in the Shadows: A New History of the French Resistance

By Robert Gildea

Faber & Faber 593pp £20 order from our bookshop

From the moment of liberation in August 1944, Charles de Gaulle made Resistance the hallmark of Frenchness. Freedom, he proclaimed in a moment of high emotion (and perhaps shrewd calculation), had been won by ‘the people’ of France, ‘with the aid of the armies of France, with the support and help of the whole of France, of fighting France, the only France, the true France, the eternal France’. Even before this mythmaking apotheosis, Resistance (always with a capital R) was a much-contested idea, and so it remained. What forms should it take? What were its goals? Who controlled it? Who were its enemies? And retrospectively, who were its heroes, villains and heirs? Robert Gildea’s new book gives answers to all these questions and shows how and why those answers have changed over the years. During and immediately after the war, the principal claimants of the Resistance mantle were the Gaullists and the communists. Later, new heroes were discovered, such as women, foreigners and Jews. Now, suggests Gildea, as the Holocaust dominates public memory of the war, in place of the drivers of tanks and blowers-up of railway lines we honour those who sheltered fugitives from the gas chambers. His own picture of the Resistance follows these historiographical changes, emphasising divisions, ambivalences and changing memories and interpretations. He makes extensive use of individual diaries, memoirs and oral interviews, many from the French and British national archives, aiming to ‘lay bare individual subjectivity, the experience of resistance activity, and the meaning that resisters later gave to their actions’.

This emphasis on subjectivity means that the book’s most gripping chapters are kaleidoscopes of events and people – there is a ‘cast list’ of six and a half pages. Gildea makes no Olympian attempt to force individual accounts into an overall narrative, to correct or confirm their accuracy, or to assess the importance of people or organisations. Instead,

Sara Stewart


Follow Literary Review on Twitter

  • Last Tweets

    • Thomas Hardy's phrenologist tells him he will 'lead to no good' in a new book about his life in London ,
    • John Knox said that crowning a woman was akin to putting ‘a saddle upon the back of an unruly cow’. Tell that to Catherine de'Medici...,
    • RT : I 💕💕 the Pulpit article in September's about rereading books at different times of life.,
    • Interesting thread by Aki there on inclusivity in publishing. (Read her tweets for full thread.),
    • RT : A conference about inclusivity in publishing is a fantastic idea, but doesn't £200 seem a short-sighted undermining of, well, inclusivity?,
    • Calling all friends of bulbous salutations & the elfin grot: lots of entries to have already come in, but my door’s still open...,