Michael Foot is a soldier and a scholar, which is a rare combination. He is a gentleman, too, something less identifiable nowadays. One of his principal subjects is Gladstone’s papers; the other is the SOE. People who know Foot (including this writer) may tend to collate his wartime record with his solid histories of the SOE – and yet it is now evident that his work on the SOE started about two decades after the war, in which he had indeed been involved in special operations, though not with the SOE. This distinction makes Foot’s Memories more interesting, not less. His life during the war would suffice for a book by itself. He had a Good War – in spite of the deep wounds he suffered in November 1944 – because the war came during his formative years.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
'Narratively speaking, "Antkind" doesn’t develop. It just continues. It’s a "New Yorker" Shouts & Murmurs squib inflated to Tolstoyan girth.'
@KevPow3 struggles through Charlie Kaufman's mammoth novel, 'Antkind'.
Thanks to @Lit_Review for the book review! https://literaryreview.co.uk/from-bombay-to-the-green-benches
Booker Prize winner, J. Banville, on SICK SOULS, HEALTHY MINDS @Lit_Review. "Timely...given the ...the world as it plunges towards hell in a handcart. Kaag beautifully has it, ‘Pragmatism is about life and its amelioration. That’s it.’" https://literaryreview.co.uk/the-pragmatists-progress @PrincetonUPress