Mark Maslin
Poles Apart
The Wizard and the Prophet: Two Groundbreaking Scientists and Their Conflicting Visions of the Future of Our Planet
By Charles C Mann
Picador 608pp £25
Many people, envisaging the future of this planet, see a dark, dysfunctional world in which humans have destroyed the environment and superheated the climate. Others regard technology, along with the constant ability of humans to innovate, as a panacea that will cure every ill. It seems our future will resemble either Blade Runner or Star Trek. But why is there such a divergence in our perceptions of the future and our role in shaping it? Charles Mann, in his beautifully written The Wizard and the Prophet, shows us how in the 20th century these radically different views were personified by two charismatic American scientists, William Vogt and Norman Borlaug.
William Vogt, the ‘Prophet’, was born in 1902 and laid the foundations for the modern environmental movement, particularly its more apocalyptic wing. He argued in books and speeches that unless we cut our consumption and population, we will overwhelm the ecosystem and cause a human disaster ‘on a
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
Russia’s recent efforts to destabilise the Baltic states have increased enthusiasm for the EU in these places. With Euroscepticism growing in countries like France and Germany, @owenmatth wonders whether Europe’s salvation will come from its periphery.
Owen Matthews - Sea of Troubles
Owen Matthews: Sea of Troubles - Baltic: The Future of Europe by Oliver Moody
literaryreview.co.uk
Many laptop workers will find Vincenzo Latronico’s PERFECTION sends shivers of uncomfortable recognition down their spine. I wrote about why for @Lit_Review
https://literaryreview.co.uk/hashtag-living
An insightful review by @DanielB89913888 of In Covid’s Wake (Macedo & Lee, @PrincetonUPress).
Paraphrasing: left-leaning authors critique the Covid response using right-wing arguments. A fascinating read.
via @Lit_Review