Adam Sisman
Sacrificed Genius to Respectability
Wordsworth: A Life in Letters
By Juliet Barker
Viking 347pp £25
Wordsworth claimed to so dislike the thought of his letters one day being published that, in order to guard against this possibility, he always took pains to make them as bad and dull as possible. Even if he did not intend this claim to be taken seriously, the reader is forced to agree that his letters do not sparkle. He absolutely loathed the act of writing letters himself; and his habit of dictation exacerbated his tendency to long-windedness.
Thus, on the face of it, Wordsworth is not a promising subject for a ‘Life in Letters’, as Juliet Barker confesses in her introduction to this volume. Moreover, Wordsworth and his family seem to have destroyed, or at least not preserved, many of the letters one might most want to
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
How to ruin a film - a short guide by @TWHodgkinson:
Thomas W Hodgkinson - There Was No Sorcerer
Thomas W Hodgkinson: There Was No Sorcerer - Box Office Poison: Hollywood’s Story in a Century of Flops by Tim Robey
literaryreview.co.uk
How to ruin a film - a short guide by @TWHodgkinson:
Thomas W Hodgkinson - There Was No Sorcerer
Thomas W Hodgkinson: There Was No Sorcerer - Box Office Poison: Hollywood’s Story in a Century of Flops by Tim Robey
literaryreview.co.uk
Give the gift that lasts all year with a subscription to Literary Review. Save up to 35% on the cover price when you visit us at https://literaryreview.co.uk/subscribe and enter the code 'XMAS24'