Early on in How to Clone a Mammoth, Beth Shapiro warns the reader against making emotional decisions over whether extinct species should be brought back to life. Informed evaluations are critical when considering de-extinction. I’ve never understood why reason and emotion should be mutually exclusive and I suspect that deep down Shapiro doesn’t either, because How to Clone a Mammoth is a personal manifesto for de-extinction where her (informed) emotions are apparent. Therein lies its power. She doesn’t care that the genetically modified facsimile of a passenger pigeon that her lab is trying to create is not – and never will be – the real thing. She does care, however, about how genetically engineered elephants might transform the Siberian tundra, were they allowed to graze and trample and – importantly – defecate there. We learn that George Church, a powerhouse of genomics research, is one of her favourite scientists. Shapiro’s thoughts and feelings are ever present in this breezy introduction to de-extinction science and the reader is soon on first-name terms with not just George, but also Stewart (Brand), Sergey (Zimov) and the other leading lights of the de-extinction effort. She hovers on just the right side of an undergraduate introductory lecture: never exhilarating, but always warm and accessible. Shapiro’s informal approach, peppered with deadpan asides, is a welcome change from the hyperbole and grandstanding that have come to characterise popular debates on rewilding and de-extinction, and mammoth cloning in particular.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Great essay by Seán Williams @WiggishHistory in @Lit_Review
A small country "may not have aircraft carriers or regiments of tanks. But guided by an unerring moral compass, it can triumph over even the most fearsomely armed opponent." https://twitter.com/WiggishHistory/status/1278425792385613835
'Like many works that touch on Churchill, this book takes on some of his characteristics: a jaunty prose style, a capacity for confident generalisation and a whiff of bullshit.'
Richard Vinen is unpersuaded by 'The Churchill Myths'.
'It’s history from a bird’s-eye view. From that perspective, we humans are a passing phenomenon.'
Nigel Andrew on three contrasting books about birds by @RSmythFreelance, @JenGAckerman & @JonathanSlaght.