The three authors of Europe and the Islamic World, all based at French universities, have divided up their vast subject chronologically. John Tolan tackles the Islamic world’s relations with Europe from the rise of Muhammad to the end of the Middle Ages; Gilles Veinstein takes the early modern period; and Henry Laurens brings the story, or rather multiple stories, up to the present day. Not only does the book have three authors, but this edition (a translation from the French), also has a foreword by John Esposito, a well-known American specialist in Islamic studies. Together they set out to challenge the thesis propounded by the conservative American political scientist Samuel P Huntington in The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (1996). Huntington argued that the West and the Islamic world were divided on cultural and religious grounds and that ‘Islam’s borders are bloody’. It follows that there is a danger of major wars in the future as Muslims seek to challenge the hegemony of the West. Esposito describes this thesis as ‘infamous’, which seems a bit steep, even if Huntington generalised from a rather flimsy knowledge of history. Esposito has chosen to ignore Huntington’s denunciations of Western cultural arrogance. Moreover, Huntington did not invent the notion of a clash between Western culture and the Islamic world – that concept seems to have been first put into circulation by the great, if somewhat eccentric, French Orientalist Louis Massignon much earlier in the 20th century.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
'Fiona Shaw, in Jonathan Miller’s production, is the best shrew I have seen. She starts off in a mustard yellow dress with a mustard sharp tongue.'
From the archive, Kate Kellaway on a 1988 production of 'The Taming of the Shrew'.
'He was not a revolutionary at all of course. He was only marginally a socialist. His tradition was rooted in the Liberal aristocracy, and his politics were entirely bounded by Parliament.'
From the archive, Paul Foot on Tony Benn's diaries.