THERE ARE TWO kinds of writing about corruption in Italy. In the first, the author takes an Olympian perspective, judging the actions of Italian public figures against the highest standards of probity, transparency and accountability. Throughout the country’s history as a unified state, writers who have adopted this point of view have repeatedly been scandalised by the peninsula’s shabby polity: the same tone of sombre disapproval runs through coverage of the Mafia in the 1870s, the banking scandals of the 1890s, Fascist nepotism and embezzlement, the corrupt post- war building boom, the antics of ‘God’s bankers’ in the 1970s and 1980s, and ‘Kickback City’ in the early 1990s. Silvio Berlusconi is only the latest focus for this kind of indignation.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
This 'jaunty narrative raises fundamental questions about the role of popular history. Should this just be a matter of telling tales, as the general public often seems to think?'
@DrLRoach weighs up Charles Spencer's account of the White Ship Disaster.
'Amis clearly belongs to the do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do school of pedagogy. More or less everything he says is demonstrably contradicted by elements of his own work, be they here or elsewhere.'
'The bar is set high at the outset, and readers are primed to wonder if Mikhail can make his case.'
Does Alan Mikhail's new life of the Sultan Selim I really overturn 'shibboleths that have held sway for a millennium'? Caroline Finkel investigates.