John Michell

Stony Ground



Profile Books 242pp £15.99 order from our bookshop

Thousands of books and papers have been written about Stonehenge, beginning in 1620 when Inigo Jones described and explained the monument for the benefit of James I. He thought it must have been a Roman temple. Someone else wrote another book explaining it differently – as a coronation chapel for Danish kings – and a third book then appeared, by the architect John Webb, asserting that his father-in-law, Jones, was right after all. This was the first battle of opinions in the war over Stonehenge that has continued on the same rancorous level up to the present. Already this year two teams of archaeologists have proclaimed their solutions to the mystery: one that it is a ‘prehistoric Lourdes’ for health and healing, the other that ancient royalty was buried there. Other modern guesses have it as a market for axe-trading, a computer for calculating eclipses, a place of Druid enchantments and a landmark for UFOs. The professional archaeologists disapprove of all these notions but have nothing much to offer in their place, and their fruitless excavations over most of Stonehenge have destroyed evidence which later researchers would have valued.

Follow Literary Review on Twitter

  • Last Tweets

    • 'Pollan has no doubt that the use of psychedelics could have a powerfully beneficial effect on a range of condition… ,
    • A memoir about an Untouchable family and the 'formation of modern India': 'Ants among Elephants' by @gidla_sujatha… ,
    • RT : First founded in Edinburgh in 1979, is considered a trusted independent source for reviews of new book… ,
    • 'In different ways Hatherley makes gritty Lódź and poor old which-country-are-we-in-this-week Lviv sound entrancing… ,
    • In this issue Lucy Popescu discusses the miscarriages of justice occurring in the investigation over Maltese journa… ,
    • 'Rodin’s fascination with ancient Greek sculpture is part of a long and distinguished French tradition.' A review o… ,
    • The New Testament, in a new translation by David Bentley Hart, reviewed by Salley Vickers ,