Oh dear. Just twelve months ago, Danny Leigh wrote a long piece for The Guardian on how he had been determined that his first novel, The Greatest Gift, would not be ‘just so much autobiography by proxy’. Indeed, he ‘bridled at the thought of joining those novelists torn between having a story to tell and wanting to tell their own; the creators of that book mountain glaringly drawn from life, yet unreal in all the most important places – tales of sexual exotica in Crouch End or Brixton Hill, drizzly portraits of “lovesick” blokes with alphabetised CDs and brand new football scarves, florid reminiscences of raving in the desert or backpacking around South-East Asia’. And three cheers for all that. But here we are, a year on, and along comes Leigh’s second novel, The Monsters of Gramercy Park – a book which, while it could never be accused of being confessionally autobiographical, is nevertheless remarkably solipsistic. The Monsters of Gramercy Park is one of those novels about a writer. Worse, it is one of those novels about two writers. Worse still, it is one of those novels about two writers, one of whom is suffering from writer’s block.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
'In their needling, selfish, dry-as-dust way, these three books are works of cumulative power and never less than consistent interest.'
@lieutenantkije weighs up the final novel in J M Coetzee's Jesus trilogy.
'It remains a poem comprised of clay fragments, short and long, and though the desert delivers up occasional additional text, we are a long way from a whole poem.'
Michael Schmidt on the oldest surviving poem in the world.
'Apparently if you’re a teenager and you send a declaration of love to someone heart emoji, heart emoji, heart emoji and they come back smiley face, that’s the worst.'
Thomas Blaikie tries to get his head round the language of the internet.