James Purdon
The Critic in the Classroom
Professing Criticism: Essays on the Organization of Literary Study
By John Guillory
University of Chicago Press 464pp £24
Unlike our colleagues in most other academic disciplines, those of us who study and teach English literature have never quite managed to agree on a single term that aligns what we do – our professional identity as teachers and researchers – with the materials we study. People who study the stars are astronomers. Economists investigate the economy. But what do you call someone who spends their working hours trying to reconstruct Milton’s understanding of classical poetics, or teaching students to appreciate the short stories of Katherine Mansfield? We know what it is that we study, but what is it, exactly, that we do?
The obvious answer, as John Guillory asserts in this magisterial survey of the development and state of the discipline, is criticism: ‘If literature is studied in the university, it is criticism that is professed.’ Yet this answer is complicated, he explains, by the fact that something called ‘criticism’ already existed – in the wild, so to speak – long before the teaching and study of vernacular writing became the focus of university departments. This was the criticism that had emerged in Enlightenment England, in the pages of literary and philosophical journals such as Addison and Steele’s Spectator and Johnson’s Rambler, and which ranged freely across the cultural, political, and economic life of the nation. By the end of the 19th century, when the study of English literature at last began to be formalised as an academic discipline, its practitioners faced a struggle to define the object and methods of the new discipline. Was ‘English’ to be associated with the quasi-scientific scholarly rigour of philology, precursor to what we now call ‘linguistics’, or with the aesthetic refinement of belles-lettres – to be, in other words, a form of training for students to appreciate literary excellence? Ought it to take over the functions of classics, teaching a new kind of rhetorical proficiency appropriate to a society in which writing was now a more necessary skill than oratory? Or was it to be a form of historical study, dedicated to the antiquarian recovery and interpretation of the literary culture of the past?
These questions, according to Guillory, began to be resolved only after the First World War, when – in the United States, at least – higher education in the humanities moved decisively away from the classical curriculum, investing students instead with a new form of cultural and social capital
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
Knowledge of Sufism increased markedly with the publication in 1964 of The Sufis, by Idries Shah. Nowadays his writings, much like his father’s, are dismissed for their Orientalism and inaccuracy.
@fitzmorrissey investigates who the Shahs really were.
Fitzroy Morrissey - Sufism Goes West
Fitzroy Morrissey: Sufism Goes West - Empire’s Son, Empire’s Orphan: The Fantastical Lives of Ikbal and Idries Shah by Nile Green
literaryreview.co.uk
Rats have plagued cities for centuries. But in Baltimore, researchers alighted on one surprising solution to the problem of rat infestation: more rats.
@WillWiles looks at what lessons can be learned from rat ecosystems – for both rats and humans.
Will Wiles - Puss Gets the Boot
Will Wiles: Puss Gets the Boot - Rat City: Overcrowding and Urban Derangement in the Rodent Universes of John B ...
literaryreview.co.uk
Twisters features destructive tempests and blockbuster action sequences.
@JonathanRomney asks what the real danger is in Lee Isaac Chung's disaster movie.
https://literaryreview.co.uk/eyes-of-the-storm