Beginnings is a truly remarkable work of criticism which, for some reason, has had far less than its due share of attention since appearing in 1975. Reviewers were probably bewildered, not only by the range and complexity of Said’s thinking, but also by the curiously reflexive or inward turn of argument which his text frequently takes. On one level, the book is a synoptic account of modern French structuralism, with extensive reference to Barthes, Foucault, Derrida and other leading lights on the Parisian intellectual scene. At the same time, it is angled from an off-centre nexus of preoccupying themes and problems which make it – properly understood – something other (and more) than a handbook of structuralist idees reçues. That ‘beginnings’, as a topic of thought, are profoundly difficult to grasp; that thought is both engendered and perpetually baffled when it broaches the subject of its own beginning; that texts, and modern texts especially, are caught up in the same problematics of relationship and origin – these are just a few of the questions raised by Said’s elusive commentary.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
This 'jaunty narrative raises fundamental questions about the role of popular history. Should this just be a matter of telling tales, as the general public often seems to think?'
@DrLRoach weighs up Charles Spencer's account of the White Ship Disaster.
'Amis clearly belongs to the do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do school of pedagogy. More or less everything he says is demonstrably contradicted by elements of his own work, be they here or elsewhere.'
'The bar is set high at the outset, and readers are primed to wonder if Mikhail can make his case.'
Does Alan Mikhail's new life of the Sultan Selim I really overturn 'shibboleths that have held sway for a millennium'? Caroline Finkel investigates.