A radical critique of Western philosophy, a disorientating reading of familiar texts, a stunning verbal agility, not to mention a disconcerting tendency to ‘deconstruct’ his critics – all this already adds up to a formidable and subversive intellectual enterprise. But Derrida does not make things easy for his readers. His elliptical and convoluted style is quite deliberate. Refusing to make clearcut distinctions between the philosophical and literary uses of language, and contesting the view that any such thing as an ‘objective’ account or summary of a philosophical text is possible, he embodies this theoretical position in texts that forbid consoling illusions of simplicity.
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Chuffed to be on the Curiosity Pill 2020 round-up for my @Lit_Review piece on swimming, which I cannot wait to get back to after 10+ months away https://literaryreview.co.uk/different-strokes https://twitter.com/RNGCrit/status/1351922254687383553
'The authors do not shrink from spelling out the scale of the killings when the Rhodesians made long-distance raids on guerrilla camps in Mozambique and Zambia.'
Xan Smiley on how Rhodesia became Zimbabwe.
'Thirkell was a product of her time and her class. For her there are no sacred cows, barring those that win ribbons at the Barchester Agricultural.'
The novelist Angela Thirkell is due a revival, says Patricia T O'Conner (£).