Florence Hazrat
Shouty Jane Austen?
On the evolution of the exclamation mark
Empire-line dresses, top hats, elegant balls and proper social etiquette. The world of Jane Austen’s novels is one of poise and restraint, both in manner and in literary style. Or so we think. But what if the queen of the balanced sentence was actually a more vibrant and (dare we say it) sloppier writer than we assume? What if Austen’s original punctuation shows a writer freely skating from thought to thought and allowing emotion to bubble up from the paper, only for this to be pierced by editorial interventions, dampening her textual liveliness?
Professor Kathryn Sutherland of Oxford University has published Austen’s surviving manuscripts both online and in print, permitting us to peep into the writer’s works in progress. Looking over Jane’s shoulder, we realise, for example, just how exclaim-happy she was, peppering her drafts with exclamation marks (as well as dashes, underlinings, crossings-outs and blotted letters). Surviving drafts of two of the chapters of her posthumously published novel Persuasion, probably nearly finished pieces as she sent them to her publisher for reading over, let us see the before and after states of Austen’s works. In this passage, the long-in-love couple Anne Elliot and Captain Wentworth (relationship status: it’s complicated) reflect on their years of will-they-won’t-they. The print version of 1818 reads thus:
‘You should have distinguished,’ replied Anne. ‘You should not have suspected me now; the case so different, and my age so different. If I was wrong in yielding to persuasion once, remember that it was to persuasion exerted on the side of safety, not of risk. When I yielded, I thought it was to duty; but no duty could be called in aid here. In marrying a man indifferent to me, all risk would have been incurred, and all duty violated.’
The sobriety and self-control exuded by the full stops and the semicolon after the weighty ‘duty’ stand in stark contrast to the vitality of the original manuscript, with its capitalised words, emphatic underscorings, shoal of dashes and single bold exclamation mark:
‘You should have distinguished – replied Anne –
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
Spring has sprung and here is the April issue of @Lit_Review featuring @sophieolive on Dorothea Tanning, @JamesCahill on Peter Hujar and Paul Thek, @lifeisnotanovel on Stephanie Wambugu, @BaptisteOduor on Gwendoline Riley and so much more: http://literaryreview.co.uk
A review of my biography of Wittgenstein, and of his newly published last love letters, in the Literary Review: via @Lit_Review
Jane O'Grady - It’s a Wonderful Life
Jane O'Grady: It’s a Wonderful Life - Ludwig Wittgenstein: Philosophy in the Age of Airplanes by Anthony Gottlieb;...
literaryreview.co.uk
It was my pleasure to review Stephanie Wambugu’s enjoyably Ferrante-esque debut Lonely Crowds for @Lit_Review’s April issue, out now
Joseph Williams - Friends Disunited
Joseph Williams: Friends Disunited - Lonely Crowds by Stephanie Wambugu
literaryreview.co.uk