Florence Hazrat
Shouty Jane Austen?
On the evolution of the exclamation mark
Empire-line dresses, top hats, elegant balls and proper social etiquette. The world of Jane Austen’s novels is one of poise and restraint, both in manner and in literary style. Or so we think. But what if the queen of the balanced sentence was actually a more vibrant and (dare we say it) sloppier writer than we assume? What if Austen’s original punctuation shows a writer freely skating from thought to thought and allowing emotion to bubble up from the paper, only for this to be pierced by editorial interventions, dampening her textual liveliness?
Professor Kathryn Sutherland of Oxford University has published Austen’s surviving manuscripts both online and in print, permitting us to peep into the writer’s works in progress. Looking over Jane’s shoulder, we realise, for example, just how exclaim-happy she was, peppering her drafts with exclamation marks (as well as dashes, underlinings, crossings-outs and blotted letters). Surviving drafts of two of the chapters of her posthumously published novel Persuasion, probably nearly finished pieces as she sent them to her publisher for reading over, let us see the before and after states of Austen’s works. In this passage, the long-in-love couple Anne Elliot and Captain Wentworth (relationship status: it’s complicated) reflect on their years of will-they-won’t-they. The print version of 1818 reads thus:
‘You should have distinguished,’ replied Anne. ‘You should not have suspected me now; the case so different, and my age so different. If I was wrong in yielding to persuasion once, remember that it was to persuasion exerted on the side of safety, not of risk. When I yielded, I thought it was to duty; but no duty could be called in aid here. In marrying a man indifferent to me, all risk would have been incurred, and all duty violated.’
The sobriety and self-control exuded by the full stops and the semicolon after the weighty ‘duty’ stand in stark contrast to the vitality of the original manuscript, with its capitalised words, emphatic underscorings, shoal of dashes and single bold exclamation mark:
‘You should have distinguished – replied Anne –
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
Under its longest-serving editor, Graydon Carter, Vanity Fair was that rare thing – a New York society magazine that published serious journalism.
@PeterPeteryork looks at what Carter got right.
Peter York - Deluxe Editions
Peter York: Deluxe Editions - When the Going Was Good: An Editor’s Adventures During the Last Golden Age of Magazines by Graydon Carter
literaryreview.co.uk
Henry James returned to America in 1904 with three objectives: to see his brother William, to deliver a series of lectures on Balzac, and to gather material for a pair of books about modern America.
Peter Rose follows James out west.
Peter Rose - The Restless Analyst
Peter Rose: The Restless Analyst - Henry James Comes Home: Rediscovering America in the Gilded Age by Peter Brooks...
literaryreview.co.uk
Vladimir Putin served his apprenticeship in the KGB toward the end of the Cold War, a period during which Western societies were infiltrated by so-called 'illegals'.
Piers Brendon examines how the culture of Soviet spycraft shaped his thinking.
Piers Brendon - Tinker, Tailor, Sleeper, Troll
Piers Brendon: Tinker, Tailor, Sleeper, Troll - The Illegals: Russia’s Most Audacious Spies and the Plot to Infiltrate the West by Shaun Walker
literaryreview.co.uk