Michael Alexander offers ‘an introductory critical survey of Pound’s verse as a whole’. After books by Kenner, Davie, Espey, Dekker, Stock and many others, do we still need such a thing? American academics have become divided unevenly into the Pound industry (producing some fascinating work on sources and contexts) and the majority who have put the poet out of mind – or at least out of the syllabus. The English seem forever to be writing introductions. Do they feel guilty of having slighted the Cantos, ever since Leavis dismissed them as ‘Mr Pound’s The Ring and the Book’? Or are they uneasy at never having absorbed the modernist movement, born on their native soil at the beginning of this country?
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Thanks to @Lit_Review for the book review! https://literaryreview.co.uk/from-bombay-to-the-green-benches
Booker Prize winner, J. Banville, on SICK SOULS, HEALTHY MINDS @Lit_Review. "Timely...given the ...the world as it plunges towards hell in a handcart. Kaag beautifully has it, ‘Pragmatism is about life and its amelioration. That’s it.’" https://literaryreview.co.uk/the-pragmatists-progress @PrincetonUPress
Applebaum 'turns a blind eye to the failings of her own tribe. The measured, reasonable ... meritocratic elite she celebrates, maybe a wee bit smugly, must bear some responsibility for the populist backlash.'
@David_Goodhart looks at liberal failures.