Michael Alexander offers ‘an introductory critical survey of Pound’s verse as a whole’. After books by Kenner, Davie, Espey, Dekker, Stock and many others, do we still need such a thing? American academics have become divided unevenly into the Pound industry (producing some fascinating work on sources and contexts) and the majority who have put the poet out of mind – or at least out of the syllabus. The English seem forever to be writing introductions. Do they feel guilty of having slighted the Cantos, ever since Leavis dismissed them as ‘Mr Pound’s The Ring and the Book’? Or are they uneasy at never having absorbed the modernist movement, born on their native soil at the beginning of this country?
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
I review the letters of John Berryman in this month's @Lit_Review. https://literaryreview.co.uk/poet-of-procrastination
I wrote about Vivien Eliot’s tragic life for the new double issue of @Lit_Review #amreading
Elizabeth Lowry - Marriage Made in Hell | Literary Review | Issue 492 https://literaryreview.co.uk/marriage-made-in-hell
Just when you thought that the latest @Lit_Review was so full of good things to read there wasn't mush room for any more, they squeezed in my review of 'Entangled Life' by that fun guy @MerlinSheldrake