The Scent of Empires: Chanel No. 5 and Red Moscow by Karl Schlögel (Translated from German by Jessica Spengler) - review by Donald Rayfield

Donald Rayfield

Eau de Hammer & Sickle

The Scent of Empires: Chanel No. 5 and Red Moscow

By

Polity 220pp £20 order from our bookshop
 

Most historians of Russia present us with what they saw and heard; Karl Schlögel, however, tells us what he smelled. Olfactory impressions can be deeper and longer than those left by the other senses, although they are not easy to convey (unless you use a sachet instead of a book). If you had taken a blind, deaf visitor just a hundred yards from Checkpoint Charlie into the Soviet sector of Berlin, he or she would instantly have been struck by the stench of mercaptan (a knockout gas that smells like boiled cabbage) in car exhaust fumes, the smell of sour milk from workplace canteens, the synthetic cherry smell of the wax on the floors, and the pungent crowds, whose body odours, not blocked by deodorants, created a heady atmosphere.

In this wide-ranging but concise study, just as in his Moscow 1937, a very original survey of the USSR during the Great Terror, Schlögel deals with subjects that are parallel and peripheral to his main theme, which is French and Russian perfume-making. The story begins with Ernest Beaux, a perfumer to the Russian court, fleeing back to his native France after the revolution and adapting his Catherine the Great perfume for Coco Chanel. In the 1920s and 1930s, as the Soviet elite gave up proletarian dress for Western fashions, Chanel’s perfumes found their way back to Russia.

Coco Chanel was a ruthless collaborator with Nazism, trying with German help to appropriate her Jewish business partners’ share in the Chanel enterprise (only her connections with British political elites saved her from prosecution after the war). In Russia she had a counterpart in the ruthlessly doctrinaire Jewish communist Polina

Sign Up to our newsletter

Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.

Follow Literary Review on Twitter