Richard Cockett
United by a Common Language?
Shadows of Empire: The Anglosphere in British Politics
By Michael Kenny & Nick Pearce
Polity Press 212pp £14.99
On 27 June, an extremely rare event took place in central London. The Anglosphere officially took to the stage for a morning of self-aggrandisement. The occasion was the gathering of a panel at the think-tank Policy Exchange to discuss the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing network, essentially the bedrock of Western defence. Present was an imposing collection of former prime ministers, foreign ministers and other bigwigs from Britain, Australia, Canada, the United States and New Zealand. They all agreed that Five Eyes was invaluable and evidence of the intimate relations that exist between these countries in regard to defence and intelligence. John Howard, the provocative former prime minister of Australia, begged to be forgiven for a bit of ‘Anglosphere triumphalism’. But it was undoubtedly in the air. The panel was effectively celebrating the closest and most enduring coalition of interests in the modern era, arising from the shared endeavours and sacrifices of the Second World War.
Over the past decades, the concept of the Anglosphere fell out of favour in Britain, a country that was supposedly an integral – if never very loyal – member of the EU and an enthusiastic multilateral participant at the UN and in other forums. But that was before Brexit. Now the country is once again in search of a role, as America’s former secretary of state Dean Acheson famously jibed in 1962. Europe was supposed to be a substitute for empire, but now that we have renounced both of these could the Anglosphere provide Britain with a new sense of purpose?
That, roughly, is the question at the heart of Shadows of Empire, written by two academics, Michael Kenny and Nick Pearce. It is a timely tome. Certainly, some pro-Brexit ministers, such as Liam Fox, seem to think that hugging America and the English-speaking world close should be our way forward.
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
It wasn’t until 1825 that Pepys’s diary became available for the first time. How it was eventually decrypted and published is a story of subterfuge and duplicity.
Kate Loveman tells the tale.
Kate Loveman - Publishing Pepys
Kate Loveman: Publishing Pepys
literaryreview.co.uk
Arthur Christopher Benson was a pillar of the Edwardian establishment. He was supremely well connected. As his newly published diaries reveal, he was also riotously indiscreet.
Piers Brendon compares Benson’s journals to others from the 20th century.
Piers Brendon - Land of Dopes & Tories
Piers Brendon: Land of Dopes & Tories - The Benson Diaries: Selections from the Diary of Arthur Christopher Benson by Eamon Duffy & Ronald Hyam (edd)
literaryreview.co.uk
Of the siblings Gwen and Augustus John, it is Augustus who has commanded most attention from collectors and connoisseurs.
Was he really the finer artist, asks Tanya Harrod, or is it time Gwen emerged from her brother’s shadow?
Tanya Harrod - Cut from the Same Canvas
Tanya Harrod: Cut from the Same Canvas - Artists, Siblings, Visionaries: The Lives and Loves of Gwen and Augustus John by Judith Mackrell
literaryreview.co.uk