Norman Stone
Centre of Tension
Salonica, City of Ghosts: Christians, Muslims and Jews
By Mark Mazower
HarperCollins 554pp £25
A STRANGE FUSS was made when Macedonia became independent. Greece did not want it to have that name - an affront, she said, to her national pride, Alexander the Great, etc. Since Greece could block European proceedings with her veto, she had her way, and the new country was generally called 'FYROM' - 'Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia'. Are we to start using 'FEPNEZ' to refer to 'Former English Possession of New Zealand', on the grounds that the Dutch might be offended? It was, to an outsider, a mysterious business, and not a few Greeks also said it was childish: Greece should simply have declared a mission to lead the Balkans out of Communism. But the whole affair had nothing much to do with Alexander the Great's Hellenism. It had much more to do with the Greek Civil War in the later 1940s, when Salonica, with its Macedonian hinterland, might easily have turned into a sort of North Vietnam: that was really prevented by British and then American intervention, and it greatly helped in the early phase that Stalin and Churchill had made a bargain - the British were to have Greece, the Soviets Bulgaria and Romania. An independent, formerly Communist Macedonia represented a double threat as far as Greece was concerned: it might encourage some sort of irredentism among Greece's own Slavonic-speaking minority, and it might become a point of infiltration for Communists who meant modern Greece only ill. The Greek campaign was mishandled, and became ridiculous (and, for official Europe, tiresome); but at bottom the concerns were not senseless.
Mark Mazower, in his grand survey of the history of Salonica, somewhat jumps over the Communist episode, but the city was the capital of Communist Greece. It had the perfect ingredients. Docks were usually Red. National minorities were also good recruiting-ground for Communism, and Salonica had many. There was an
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
Twitter Feed
It wasn’t until 1825 that Pepys’s diary became available for the first time. How it was eventually decrypted and published is a story of subterfuge and duplicity.
Kate Loveman tells the tale.
Kate Loveman - Publishing Pepys
Kate Loveman: Publishing Pepys
literaryreview.co.uk
Arthur Christopher Benson was a pillar of the Edwardian establishment. He was supremely well connected. As his newly published diaries reveal, he was also riotously indiscreet.
Piers Brendon compares Benson’s journals to others from the 20th century.
Piers Brendon - Land of Dopes & Tories
Piers Brendon: Land of Dopes & Tories - The Benson Diaries: Selections from the Diary of Arthur Christopher Benson by Eamon Duffy & Ronald Hyam (edd)
literaryreview.co.uk
Of the siblings Gwen and Augustus John, it is Augustus who has commanded most attention from collectors and connoisseurs.
Was he really the finer artist, asks Tanya Harrod, or is it time Gwen emerged from her brother’s shadow?
Tanya Harrod - Cut from the Same Canvas
Tanya Harrod: Cut from the Same Canvas - Artists, Siblings, Visionaries: The Lives and Loves of Gwen and Augustus John by Judith Mackrell
literaryreview.co.uk