Carole Angier
In Defense of Literary Biography
IN HIS RECENT life of B S Johnson (reviewed in June's LR) Jonathan Coe tells a sad tale. In the 1960s and 1970s Johnson wrote seven avant-garde novels, now mainly remembered for their experimental antics: one was Published in sections in a box, another had a hole cut through several pages. In fact, Coe argues, Johnson was a wonderful storyteller. But his theories - his distrust of fiction and constant deconstruction of the form - slowly strangled both his novels and him. Soon after finishing the last one - 'in many ways the work of a writer at the end of his artistic tether', Coe says - Johnson committed suicide.
This will probably be Coe's only biography, so I'm not really worried about him. But he has done the same thing. Throughout this literary biography he tells us why he dislikes and distrusts literary biography; and, like Johnson, he constantly subverts
Sign Up to our newsletter
Receive free articles, highlights from the archive, news, details of prizes, and much more.@Lit_Review
Follow Literary Review on Twitter
'There are at least two dozen members of the House of Commons today whose names I cannot read without laughing because I know what poseurs and place-seekers they are.'
From the archive, Christopher Hitchens on the Oxford Union.
https://literaryreview.co.uk/mother-of-unions
Chuffed to be on the Curiosity Pill 2020 round-up for my @Lit_Review piece on swimming, which I cannot wait to get back to after 10+ months away https://literaryreview.co.uk/different-strokes https://twitter.com/RNGCrit/status/1351922254687383553
'The authors do not shrink from spelling out the scale of the killings when the Rhodesians made long-distance raids on guerrilla camps in Mozambique and Zambia.'
Xan Smiley on how Rhodesia became Zimbabwe.
https://literaryreview.co.uk/what-the-secret-agent-saw